[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4505: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4507: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4508: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4509: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
Sagan Technology Metro • View topic - VST to Audio Unit Wrapper - Why?

VST to Audio Unit Wrapper - Why?

Topics related to effect plug-ins

VST to Audio Unit Wrapper - Why?

Postby Scoot » Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:21 pm

Apart from having the VST plugins work system wide (which I don't need anyway), why would you do this?

Are they going to take less CPU or would they just run the same as they do under VST?


If this would allow you to run OS9 plugs then that would be cool. :lol:
Scoot
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 10:50 pm
Location: New Zealand

Postby Jerm » Sun Apr 20, 2003 9:26 pm

No. The purpose for this is to get a program that no longer supports VST (e.g. Apples-> Logic) to run VST plug-ins.
Last edited by Jerm on Mon Apr 21, 2003 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jerm
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Postby Scoot » Mon Apr 21, 2003 1:20 am

Ahhhh I think I can guess why such a 'seperate' company like emagic would want to do that! :wink: :wink: :wink:
Scoot
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 10:50 pm
Location: New Zealand

posting

Postby Naveed123 » Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:34 am

this is very very nice and going to take less CPU or would they just run the same as they do under VST?
Naveed123
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:28 am

Re: VST to Audio Unit Wrapper - Why?

Postby Jerm » Fri Jun 07, 2013 3:01 am

I don't really understand your question here.

The wrapper is so the programmer has less code to write as it makes one plug-in format similar to another.
Image
Jerm
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Massachusetts


Return to Effects/Plug-ins

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron