[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4505: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4507: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4508: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4509: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
Sagan Technology Metro • View topic - Metro 6 LX Released!

Metro 6 LX Released!

General announcements appear here.

Postby Jerm » Sun Jan 18, 2004 12:06 pm

That is good! :D
Jerm
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Postby braj » Sun Jan 18, 2004 3:47 pm

I totally disagree. I have a 667 Ti and I only start running into performance issues at 7 or 8 tracks. Sure, this is an app that you'll want a powerful comp to use, but all thinks considered, it's way more productive an environment than anything else I've used because it's som simple. For instance, if you use an external AU synth, you can save your patches and have them appear in the same way as any other native sound. So, if I save a sampled trumpet under 'Woodwinds' it will be right there to use with everything else. I don't have to configure an effect, set the midi channel, do this, do that, before it's ready. It is very seamless.

It definitely has it's limitations, but it's a joy to use, and that's one feature that's hard to implement. Metro definitely has it's advantages, but ease of use and a straightforward interface aren't necessarily it's strong points.
braj
 

Postby Scoot » Sun Jan 18, 2004 5:21 pm

I think you 2 garageband'ers are probably using it in 2 different ways.

If there is more effect processing power in the 4 tracks as opposed to the 8, it's going to struggle.

The only way to benchmark it correctly, is both having the same document open.

Maybe polara can send braj instructions on how to seriously slow down the Ti. Obviously the joy for braj is already breaking the 4 audio track limit of SE in garageband and it coping......whereas I'm more interested in the midi tweaking in metro. (just call me multi-take scoot :) )


As for metro ease of use.......it's pretty straight forward.....it may just need a few tips on initally setting it up to work with.....which is why we are here.
It's far easier than DP or Logic........and my personal favourite......Pro Tools.......which is supposed to be so simple as there are only 2 windows to work in......what they don't say is there's heaps of dialog boxes and settings not in the windows. :lol:


scoot.
Scoot
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 10:50 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Garageband versus Metro

Postby JoshMaddox » Sat Jan 31, 2004 10:45 am

polara wrote: You can't directly input any AIFFs, having to import them into iTunes and then drag-n-drop.



You can just drop the aiff from the cd onto a new track in GarageBand. Make a new real instrument, set it to vocal or whatever, no effect, drag the track from the CD and drop it on the new instrument, no itunes needed or required.

Garage band runs fine on the couple of machines I've tested it on, barring my laptop. Those machines being dual 533's with 512mb, and 800mhz IMac G4's. It is picky on my TiBook, but it's a second generation 550 with a 7200 rpm drive and 1 gig of memory.
JoshMaddox
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 10:37 am

Postby mtjazz » Sat Jan 31, 2004 2:23 pm

braj wrote: So, if I save a sampled trumpet under 'Woodwinds' it will be right there to use with everything else.


i tried and tried to let this go, but it was like having a gnat in your ear. so here it goes. umm....why would you save a sampled trumpet under "Woodwinds"? i know it has nothing to do with the point you were making, but a trumpet is a "Brass" instrument.

As i said, i tried to let it go, but as a french horn player, i just couldn't.
:oops:

:roll:
mtjazz
 

Postby braj » Sat Jan 31, 2004 4:11 pm

mtjazz wrote:
braj wrote: So, if I save a sampled trumpet under 'Woodwinds' it will be right there to use with everything else.


i tried and tried to let this go, but it was like having a gnat in your ear. so here it goes. umm....why would you save a sampled trumpet under "Woodwinds"? i know it has nothing to do with the point you were making, but a trumpet is a "Brass" instrument.

As i said, i tried to let it go, but as a french horn player, i just couldn't.
:oops:

:roll:


Aghh, oops, sorry. Anyway, if you wanted a trumpet under woodwinds, you could.

I'm so ashamed :oops:
braj
 

Previous

Return to Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests