[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4505: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4507: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4508: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4509: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
Sagan Technology Metro • View topic - Remote Control usability

Remote Control usability

Please post any ideas for new features in Metro or Metro SE here.

Postby GarySome1 » Wed Dec 10, 2003 3:12 pm

I vote for 2.
GarySome1
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 7:12 pm

Postby Jerm » Sat Dec 13, 2003 12:24 pm

Implemented in 6.1.0.6!
Jerm
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Postby Jerm » Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:21 am

Please let me know if these new events work in an acceptable manner.
Jerm
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Postby GarySome1 » Fri Jan 16, 2004 10:44 pm

6.1.0.6 is very usable.

Solo/Arm toggle work great for the last track.
Mute works.
The scaling on Pan is outstanding. When set to +/- 4 it feels just right.

I was unable to figure out a way to make pan affect the last selected track (it is like Solo and Arm in that there is only one pan control meant to affect the last track).

Fast Forward as a target would also be a nice addition, too.

Good stuff!
GarySome1
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 7:12 pm

Postby Jerm » Fri Jan 16, 2004 11:33 pm

Gary,

Good. Thanks for the feedback. That is what I need.
Jerm
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Massachusetts

can't remotely control from numerology?

Postby brook » Tue Dec 28, 2004 12:36 am

WHoops this should have been in a different topic so I'll move it (it's on the remote control functions but not a feature request - at least I THINK it's not a missing feature....
brook
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 9:30 pm

Postby GarySome1 » Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:35 am

Pan is the only heavily used control left that could use an additional feature to make it useful for the US-428. At first I thought it needed to be like "Solo" and "Arm" to make it work for the last track selected but that doesn't make sense because there is not a 1 to 1 correlation between tracks and mixer channels.

So, allowing selecting mixer channels as the current to be controlled for "Output Pan (+/-)" would be really useful. Maybe one controller to select the next higher channel (go from the currently selected channel to the currently selected channel + 1) and another to select the next lower channel. That way the "extra" assignable buttons could be used to select the mixer channel and the single pan control could then adjust the pan for that channel.

Any consideration for Fast Forward being a target as well?

Thanks,
Gary
GarySome1
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 7:12 pm

Postby Jerm » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:58 am

GarySome1 wrote:Any consideration for Fast Forward being a target as well?


Sorry for the delay.

Yes. Metro 6.3.3.1 implements FF as a target. It also has Track +/- as a target as well as LED MIDI output targets.

To implement what you want for pan, I think all I need to do is have a target that is the track output volume and pan. This would look at the tracks output assignment and adjust that tracks pan and/or volume.

Also, I am thinking of adding a bank select option. Any suggestions on how this should be implemented would be very helpful. I already have the concept of modifiers. There is a shift modifier and 7 option modifiers that can be targets in remote control. The options toggle so perhaps having a way to select the a track + (optionN * v) would work where optionN is an option modifer (1 thru 7) and v is a user specified variable that is the size of the bank select.
Jerm
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Previous

Return to Metro/LX/SE Feature Request

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests