[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4505: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4507: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4508: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4509: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
Sagan Technology Metro • View topic - G5 Optical Specs.

G5 Optical Specs.

Topics related to Audio

G5 Optical Specs.

Postby Scoot » Wed Jun 25, 2003 7:26 pm

SPDIF Optical specs from the G5 technical overview pdf:
16 or 24 bit input and output
output samplerate 32kHz, 44.1kHz, or 48kHz
input samplerate - external clock mode: 32kHz, 44.1kHz, or 48kHz
input samplerate - internal clock mode: 16kHz- 96kHz
Scoot
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 10:50 pm
Location: New Zealand

whats it good for?

Postby fastlanephil » Sun Jul 06, 2003 2:20 am

What and who is it for besides gamers.
fastlanephil
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 10:44 pm

Postby Jerm » Sun Jul 06, 2003 7:54 am

Well, it is hell of a lot better than 1/8 inch mini especially since I remember 8 or years ago when Apple was telling developers that there would 'never' be digital audio in or out.
Jerm
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Postby Scoot » Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:35 pm

If it's increased the number of inputs to the mac........it's a good thing.


scoot
Scoot
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 10:50 pm
Location: New Zealand

Postby Sami23 » Mon Jul 07, 2003 6:42 pm

Uh... it increases the speed of data transmission since the data is theroretically traveling at the speed of light versus being limited to traditional cabling and it's limitations...

At least that's what I've been led to believe since the late 80s when optical started appearing on "pro" studio recoding gear...

;)
Even a Wizard is a Newbie sometimes.
Sami23
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 9:35 am

Optical vs USB & FW

Postby fastlanephil » Tue Jul 08, 2003 11:15 pm

I imagine you'll need a interface device to use it with mics and standard electronic instruments. It's dedicated to audio so maybe it will have some advantages over USB and FW audio. Apple didn't mention much about audio recording with it in their statement about it.

On another note(book). Just read about the Echo Indigo io card bus for 15" and 17" powerbooks. Sounds impressive.
fastlanephil
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 10:44 pm

Postby Sami23 » Wed Jul 09, 2003 8:32 pm

"...a interface device to use it with..."

Most of the Edirol USB audio devices (if not all) already have optical outputs built in. Should be much faster than plugging into USB...

;)
Even a Wizard is a Newbie sometimes.
Sami23
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 9:35 am

Edirol & software audio through

Postby fastlanephil » Wed Jul 09, 2003 11:05 pm

I checked out the Edirol audio interfaces and they all use Apples OSX audio core driver. Does that mean no software audio through like my iMic? Yes, they all have optical.
fastlanephil
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 10:44 pm

Postby buserror » Thu Jul 10, 2003 5:25 am

Sami23 wrote:Uh... it increases the speed of data transmission since the data is theroretically traveling at the speed of light versus being limited to traditional cabling and it's limitations...


Ah ? because electric current doesn't travel at the speed of light in a conductive material ? Hmmm ? :wink:


At least that's what I've been led to believe since the late 80s when optical started appearing on "pro" studio recoding gear...

;)


It's still digital on the optical link, so you don't need to have DAC in the chassis of the Mac, and pick all the electromagnetic soup that live in there.
And the optical link will be faster than USB, but not because it's "light" but because theres no protocol overhead etc, it's synchronous and only sound.
buserror
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 8:11 am
Location: UK

Re: Edirol & software audio through

Postby Jerm » Thu Jul 10, 2003 12:16 pm

fastlanephil wrote:I checked out the Edirol audio interfaces and they all use Apples OSX audio core driver. Does that mean no software audio through like my iMic? Yes, they all have optical.

I think that is true. Currently the apple driver divorces input from output and then higher level applications and utilities merge them back together so that they look like a single device. This means they are not in sync and may not handle audio play-thru properly.
Jerm
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: Massachusetts


Return to Audio

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests